Surgical approaches to pelvic floor reconstruction among patients with pelvic organ prolapse and voiding dysfunction: a systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56183/iberojhr.v5i1.738Palavras-chave:
Pelvic floor reconstruction, Pelvic organ prolapse, Voiding dysfunction.Resumo
Since midlife women experience pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and voiding dysfunction (VD) which highly affects their quality of life. POP affects nearly fifty percent of women older than fifty and these patients often concurrently experience urinary retention together with incomplete bladder emptying. The necessity of surgical reconstruction steps in when conservative treatments prove unable to resolve the issue. The review systematizes analysis of procedures used for pelvic function recovery and improved patient life quality assessment. Researchers carried out the review which adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines while analyzing data spanning from 2000 to 2025. The study included both cohort studies and randomized trials that investigated women who received vaginal or laparoscopic or robotic or combination pelvic floor surgeries. Academic researchers studied quality of life and functional outcomes that included urinary retention together with de novo stress incontinence and overactive bladder using PFDI-20 and PISQ-12 measurement tools. The success rates of laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgery reach 90–95% for long-term outcomes by using mininally invasive mesh procedures that address pelvic organ issues. These procedures demonstrate better success than traditional vaginal approaches. The effectiveness of vaginal repairs remains significant for both elderly patients and those considered medically high-risk because they provide solid results despite higher chance of issues returning. The combination of mid-urethral slings used before surgery effectively lowers the probabilities of new postoperative urinary incontinence and retention. The satisfaction levels of patients directly depend on how their symptoms improve alongside how providers handle their treatment expectations. The surgical procedure of sacrocolpopexy generates useful effects on overactive bladder symptoms in 60% of cases but ongoing clinical studies show it induces urgency symptoms. The surgical strategy requires personalization to match patients' age with their risk levels and functional requirements using shared healthcare decisions which determine pelvic floor reconstruction plans.
Referências
Carroll L, Sullivan CO, Doody C, Perrotta C, Fullen B. Pelvic organ prolapse: The lived experience. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276788. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9629641/
Jones NHJR, Healy JC, King LJ, Saini S, Shousha S, Allen-Mersh TG. Pelvic connective tissue resilience decreases with vaginal delivery, menopause and uterine prolapse. British Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2003 Jan 29;90(4):466–72. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12673750/
Lourenço DB, Duarte-Santos HO, Partezani AD, Teles SB, Bianco B, Rios LAS, et al. Urodynamic profile of voiding in patients with pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal [Internet]. 2022 Apr 23;34(1):53–65. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35460345/
Ghanbari Z, Ghaemi M, Shafiee A, Jelodarian P, Hosseini RS, Pouyamoghaddam S, et al. Quality of Life Following Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatments in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1;11(23):7166. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36498740/
Tius V, Arcieri M, Taliento C, Pellecchia G, Capobianco G, Simoncini T, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent hysterectomy or uterine preservation: A metanalysis and systematic review. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics [Internet]. 2024 Sep 26;168(2):456–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39324500/
Doğan K, Öztoprak MY, Dura MC, Aslan İÖ. The effect of stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery on sexual function and quality of life. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association [Internet]. 2024 Jun 13;96–101. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38869033/
Pons ME, Cassadó J, Itza ID, Fernández EMV. Residuo posmiccional y síntomas de disfunción de vaciado en mujeres con prolapso de órganos pélvicos antes y después de la cirugía vaginal. Estudio de cohortes multicéntrico. Actas Urológicas Españolas [Internet]. 2020 Jun 24;45(1):57–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32593638/
Ciortea R, Roman MP, Măluțan AM, Bucuri CE, Ormindean CM, Nati ID, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with vaginal reconstructive procedures and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Sep 12;10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2023.1269214/full
Evangelopoulos N, Nessi A, Achtari C. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy. Journal of Robotic Surgery [Internet]. 2024 Feb 10;18(1). Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10858822/
Billone V, Gullo G, Perino G, Catania E, Cucinella G, Ganduscio S, et al. Robotic versus Mini-Laparoscopic Colposacropexy to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study and a Medicolegal Perspective. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2024 Aug 15;13(16):4802. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355471/
Mattsson NK, Karjalainen PK, Tolppanen AM, Heikkinen AM, Sintonen H, Härkki P, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life—a nationwide cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Internet]. 2019 Dec 11;222(6):588.e1-588.e10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31836546/
Sato H, Abe H, Ikeda A, Miyagawa T, Sato K. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology [Internet]. 2020 Mar 9;41(1):128–32. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01443615.2020.1724914
Anglim BC, Ramage K, Sandwith E, Brennand EA. Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: influence of peri-operative factors and trial of void protocol. BMC Women S Health [Internet]. 2021 May 11;21(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33975584/
Lo TS, Harun F, Alzabedi A, Chiung HK, Jhang LS, Hsieh WC. Voiding dysfunction in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and bladder outlet obstruction following pelvic reconstructive surgery: urodynamic profile and predictive risk factors. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology [Internet]. 2023 Nov 10;31(2):102–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37952873/
Krutova VA, Tarabanova OV, Khachetsukova AA, Khalaphyan AA. Postoperative pelvic dysfunctions associated with the reconstruction of the pelvic floor. Minerva Ginecologica [Internet]. 2020 Nov 1;72(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33200600/
Pirtea M, Balint O, Secoșan C, Costăchescu D, Dabîca A, Navolan D. Quality of Life Assessment After Pelvic prolapse Surgery With and Without mesh: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Medicine [Internet]. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1325. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40004855/
Hagen, S., Glazener, C., Sinclair, L., Stark, D., Bugge, C., Elders, A., ... & Toozs-Hobson, P. (2016). Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 215(6), 721.e1-721.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.051
Hegde, A., Barber, M. D., & Paraiso, M. F. R. (2020). Outcomes of combined vaginal and abdominal approaches for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 223(2), 217.e1-217.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.017
Hoffman, M. S., Robinson, R., & Gleason, T. (2017). Postoperative urinary retention following pelvic reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 23(5), 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000425
Lowder, J. L., Ghetti, C., Oliphant, S. S., Burrows, L. J., & Varner, R. E. (2016). Effect of prolapse surgery on quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 128(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001464
Maher, C., Baessler, K., Barber, M. D., & DeLancey, J. O. (2016). Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: A systematic review. The Lancet Oncology, 17(12), e348–e367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00073-0
Nygaard, I., Brubaker, L., Zyczynski, H. M., Cundiff, G., Richter, H. E., Gantz, M., & Menefee, S. A. (2013). Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 122(5), 983–989. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182885f99
Paraiso, M. F. R., Barber, M. D., Muir, T. W., Walters, M. D., & Rackley, R. R. (2011). A randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: Perioperative and one-year outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 204(4), 360.e1-360.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.052
Ruff, L. E., Holt, L., & McBride, A. W. (2020). Long-term outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, 26(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000780
Sand, P. K., Goldberg, R. P., & Harris, R. L. (2020). Patient satisfaction and quality of life after prolapse surgery: A 5-year follow-up study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 42(6), 710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2020.04.002
Sung, V. W., Kassis, N. C., Rardin, C. R., & Carignan, C. S. (2021). The role of mid-urethral slings in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 225(1), 43.e1-43.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.001
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). (2019). Safety communication: FDA orders manufacturers of surgical mesh products intended for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse to stop selling all devices. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov
Weber, A. M., Abrams, P., Brubaker, L., & Cundiff, G. (2019). Urinary incontinence and prolapse surgery outcomes: Role of urodynamic testing. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 220(5), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.008
Zhu, L., Wong, F., Yang, X., & Chui, P. (2021). Laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 43(8), 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2021.04.008
Razdan S, Gousse AE. Voiding dysfunction after female pelvic surgery. In: Springer eBooks [Internet]. 2023. p. 1–26. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-030-71112-2_16-1
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Diego Andres Valdes Cabello, Luis Fabricio Correa Auqui, Esteban Eduardo González Martínez, María José Batallas Paz, Favio Sotelo Rivas

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.